Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16865 (JHR)

DEVASISH KUMAR DAS ALIAS DEVASHISH KR. DAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5355/2026 · 2026-06-17

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:17617] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5355 of 2026 ------ Devashish Kumar Das @ Devashish Kr. Das, aged about 24 years, son of Ashok Das, resident of Village Singhdaha, P.O. and P.S. Topchanchi, District Dhanbad (Jharkhand). .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Shekhar Pd. Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shashi Kumar Verma, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-17-06-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Topchanchi P.S. Case No.26 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 118(2), 109(1), 352, 351(3), 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being a member of an unlawful assembly, in prosecution of common object of the assembly, attempted to murder Anuj Kumar and Sunil Kumar. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that there was a free fight between the parties. It is further submitted that from the side of the petitioner, father of the petitioner has lodged Topchanchi P.S. Case no. 32 of 2026 against the informant and her family members. It is next submitted that the petitioner had no intention to kill anybody. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 20.05.2026 as is evident from para-14 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-15 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co- operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad in connection with Topchanchi P.S. Case No.26 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 17.06.2026 Saroj/