APHC010069022019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 3125/2019 Between: 1. A JANAKAMMA, W/O ANNA RAMACHANDRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/ O. D. NO. 20/5/500, SANJAY GANDHI COLONY, TIRAPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. A.P. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITOOR, CHITOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, CHITOOR, CHITOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, TIRUPATHI URBAN MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. R VENKAIAH, S/O LATE VENKATA SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC STATE LEADER, ADVISOR TO COMMUNIST PARTY OF INDIA, R/O. FLAT NO. 101 VIVEK CHAMBER APARTMENT DWARAKA NAGAR TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 2 JS,J W.P.No.3125 of 2019 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the orders passed by the 3rd respondent vide proceedings in ROC. Rev- ESEC/341/2018- JA(E7)/CTRCO, Chittoor dated 28-01-2019 by declaring title and granting liberty to make construction to the unofficial respondent as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and unconstitutional and consequently set aside the same IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the orders passed by the 3rd respondent vide proceedings in ROC. Rev-ESEC/ 341 / 2018-JA(E7)/ CTRCO, Chittoor dated 28-01-2019, confirming proceedings ROC. Rev-ESEC / 341 / 2018- JA(E7)/CTRCO, Chittoor dated 08-05-2018, pending disposal of the main writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SITA RAM CHAPARLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. O UDAYA KUMAR This Court made the following: 3 JS,J W.P.No.3125 of 2019 ORDER: On a request made on behalf of learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter was adjourned to 31.12.2025, on that day, a similar request was made and the matter was adjourned to 21.01.2026. When the matter was called on 18.03.2026, Sri Dhanunjaya Baru, learned counsel appeared through online, submitted that they have filed vakalat in the place of Sri Sitaram Chaparla, counsel for the petitioner on record, and at his request, the matter was adjourned to 30.03.2026. When the matter is called today, a similar request is made. 2. Further, at para No.21 of the counter-affidavit filed by the 3rd respondent, it was stated that the 5th respondent has possessed genuine documents for the house plots bearing Nos.106 to 108 since 1963 to 2015, which was not disputed by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the 5th respondent submits that pending the writ petition, the 5th respondent has obtained permission for construction from the concerned authorities and has constructed the house. 4. In view of the same, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration, and the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, this order will not preclude the petitioner to work out her remedies before the appropriate forum. No order as to costs. 4 JS,J W.P.No.3125 of 2019 As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 30th March, 2026 cbs 5 JS,J W.P.No.3125 of 2019 THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION No.3125 of 2019 30th March, 2026 cbs