CRL OP No. 11699 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-05-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI CRL OP No. 11699 of 2026 Dharshan S/o. Vadivel, ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep.by, The Sub Inspector of Police, Veppankuppam Police Station, Vellore District.Tamil Nadu. Cr.No.82 of 2026. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, to enlarge the petitioners / accused on bail in Cr.No.82 of 2026 pending on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner(s): Mr. S.Sriraam For Respondent(s): Mr.V.J.Priyadarsana Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 06.04.2026, for the offences punishable under Sections 75(l)(i) of BNS and 4 of TNPH Act, 1939 in Crime No.82 of 2026, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant being a disabled person not able to speak, have a preferred complaint against the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 11699 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 5 petitioner that she was sexually harassed by the petitioner at night time. Hence, the complaint. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner was arrested and is in judicial custody from 06.04.2026. Hence, seeks for bail. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that the petitioner is a speech and hearing impaired woman and the offence alleged is serious in nature involving outraging of modesty during night hours. If the petitioner is released on bail, there is high chance of absconding from the case, tampering of the prosecution witnesses. Hence, vehemently opposed the bail. 5.Heard both sides and perused the materials placed on record. 6.Considering the facts and circumstances, nature and gravity of offences, the manner in which the offence alleged to have taken place, the stage of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this petition stands dismissed. 06-05-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 11699 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 5 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No rli To 1. The State Rep.by, The Sub Inspector of Police, Veppankuppam Police Station, Vellore District. Tamil Nadu. 2. The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 11699 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 5 L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J. rli CRL OP No. 11699 of 2026 06-05-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 11699 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis