Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16862 (KAR)

VINODA M U v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/22814/2025 · 2026-02-06

B M Shyam Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9052 WP No. 22814 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 22814 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: VINODA M U D/O P UMESH W/O ASHOK E S AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT NO.132, FLAT NO.303, KANKSHA ASCENT APARTMENT ROAD NO.4, DEFENCE LAYOUT, VIDYARANYAPURA BANGALORE-97 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. LAKSHMIKANTH K..,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECONDARY VIDANSOUDA CHIEF OFFICER TOWN MUNICIPAL COUNSEL BANGALORE PIN-560002 2. THE THASILDAR NANJANGUDU Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9052 WP No. 22814 of 2025 NANJANAGUDU TALUK MYSORE DISTRICT PIN-571301 3. THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY FOR M/S LANCER FINANCE OFFICE AT NO.1 ALI ASKAR ROAD, BENGALURU-560052 AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, REP BY ITS COMPETENT AUTHORITY, PRAVEEN B NAYAK JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ADITYA DIWAKARA, AGA FOR R1 & R2; SRI. VEERESH R. BUDIHAL, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 11.03.2025 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-H. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9052 WP No. 22814 of 2025 ORAL ORDER The petitioner has filed this petition for consideration of his representation dated 11.03.2025 [Annexure - H]. The petitioner has filed this representation with the Competent Authority [the third respondent] as against the adjudication of his property. Mr. Veeresh R. Budihal, the learned counsel for the third respondent when queried, submits that the petitioner's representation will be considered within four [4] weeks and a decision communicated to him. In the light of the afore and informing Mr. Lakshmikanth K, the learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Aditya Diwakara, the learned Additional Advocate for the first and second respondents, the petition stands disposed of calling upon the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 11.03.2025 [Annexure - H] and - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9052 WP No. 22814 of 2025 communicate the outcome of the consideration to the petitioner within four [4] weeks from the date of receipt of this order. The petitioner is reserved with liberty to file a copy of this order with the third respondent within a week from the date of receipt thereof. Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE RB