MOHAMMAD ALTAF HAJI v. UNION TERRITORY THROUGH POLICE STATION KAKAPORA
CRM(M)/410/2026 · 2026-07-06
Shahzad Azeem
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1686 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1686 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No.03 Regular Cause List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR CRM(M) 410/2026 CrlM(952/2026) Mohammad Altaf Haji. …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Tariq M. Shah, Advocate. Vs. Union Territory Through Police Station Kakapora. ...Respondent(s) Through:
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE.
ORDER 06.07.2026
1. After arguing for some time, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that formal charges have already been framed against the petitioner and in case at the first instance statement of victim is recorded, the petitioner shall be satisfied.
2. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to the Trial Court to take necessary steps for recording of the statement of the victim, on whose testimony the entire fate of the prosecution case depends and to proceed further strictly under law, if need arises.
3. Petition is accordingly disposed of along with connected application in the manner indicated above.
(SHAHZAD AZEEM)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 06.07.2026
“Hamid”
Abdul Hamid Bhat I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 07.07.2026