VINOD @ BAGGU KRUSHNA PUJARI v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
BA/1265/2026 · 2026-10-07
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16858 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16858 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
P.H. JAYANI 919 BA1265.2026.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1265 OF 2026 Vinod @ Baggu Krushna Pujari …. Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra …Respondent Mr. Ashish B. Jagtap for the Applicant. Ms. Kranti Hiwrale, APP for the Respondent – State. CORAM:
SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.
DATED :
7th OCTOBER, 2026 P.C. :-
1. This is the 4th bail application of the applicant.
2. Ms. Hiwrale, the learned APP states that, till the date, the prosecution has examined six witnesses. The prosecution will examine the remaining witnesses and conclude the trial within six months from today.
3. Therefore, Mr. Jagtap, the learned Counsel for the Applicant seeks leave to withdraw the aforesaid bail application.
4. Leave to withdraw is granted.
5. Application stands disposed of as withdrawn.
6. It is made clear that this application is not heard on merits.
7. The prosecution is directed to examine the remaining witnesses and conclude the trial within six months from today, as noted above.
(SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.) PREETI HEERO JAYANI Digitally signed by PREETI HEERO JAYANI Date: 2026.10.09 19:58:26 +0530