VINAYAK DATTATRAY BELAMKAR v. THE LEARNED MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR
WP/17291/2025 · 2026-10-08
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16857 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16857 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
32-WP-17291-2025 (C).doc Mayur IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 17291 OF 2025 Vinayak Dattatray Belamkar ...Petitioner Versus The Learned Municipal Commissioner Pune Municipal Corporation And Anr ...Respondents ... Adv. Yatin Malvankar, for the Petitioner. ...
CORAM : MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, CJ. & ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.
DATE : 8th OCTOBER, 2026. P.C.:
1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner.
2. Considering the nature of the order proposed to be passed, no Notice is required to be issued to the Respondents.
3. The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following substantive relief :-
“That this honourable Court be pleased to issue writ mandamus or in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ direction and order thereby directing the Respondent No. 1 and 2 to decide the representation made by the Petitioner dated 15.05.2025 and the reminder to that effect dated 23.09.2025 and thereafter, proceed against the illegal encroachment done by the adjacent plot owner on the plot of land owned and possessed by the Petitioner.” 1/2 MAYUR KONDIRAM ADANE Digitally signed by MAYUR KONDIRAM ADANE Date: 2026.10.09 13:27:14 +0530
32-WP-17291-2025 (C).doc
4. The Petitioner asserts his grievance by way of a Representation dated 15th May 2025 submitted to Respondent No. 2- City Engineer, Pune Municipal Corporation, followed by a reminder dated 23rd September 2025 addressed to Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. However, till date, the Respondents have not taken any decision thereon, constraining the Petitioner to approach this Court seeking a direction to the Respondents to decide the said Representation/s.
5. Having regard to the relief/s prayed for in the Petition, no purpose would be served in keeping this Writ Petition pending for
consideration.
6. Accordingly, without entering into or adverting to the merits of the case, the Writ Petition stands disposed of with a direction to the Respondents/Competent Authority to consider and decide the Petitioner's Representation dated 15th May 2025 in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order by the Petitioner.
7. With the above observations/directions, the Writ Petition is
Disposed Of.
[ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.] [CHIEF JUSTICE] 2/2