1 2026:CGHC:7795 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 616 of 2026 Vinay Kumar Kaiwart S/o Laxman Lal Kaiwart Aged About 30 Years R/o A- 2139 Narmada Vihar NTPC Jamnipali Korba, District- Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC) Ltd. Korba Super Thermal Power Station, Through The Chief General Manager, Ntpc Korba, District Korba (C.G.) 2 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector And District Magistrate Korba, District- Korba (C.G.) 3 - The Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) And Magistrate Korba, District- Korba (C.G.) 4 - The Tahsildar And Executive Magistrate Korba District- Korba (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Priya Kaiwart, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Anuroop Panda, Advocate For Respondents 2 to 4/State : Mr.Anadi Sharma, Panel Lawyer (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 12.02.2026 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking following reliefs:- “(i) That, to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus Quash and set aside the impugned order dated 20.09.2025 issued by NTPC Korba (Annexure P-1). BINI PRADEEP Digitally signed by BINI PRADEEP Date: 2026.02.13 10:36:23 +0530 2 (ii) That, to issue a writ of mandamus directing Respondent No. 1 to provide suitable employment to the petitioner (one eligible family member) in fulfillment of the assurance contained in the Public Notice dated 04.09.1979. (iii) That, to declare the petitioner's family constitutes a land oustees family of NTPC Korba eligible for employment and rehabilitation benefits. (iv) That, any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be awarded in favor of the petitioner. 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file fresh better constituted petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the prayer made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. On due consideration, the prayer is allowed and learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the petition. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed of as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. 6. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Bini