UDAI SINGH SISODIA v. ARVINDAR SINGH SAHNEY AND ORS
CONT.CAS(C)/361/2026 · 2026-03-09
Tejas Karia
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1685 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1685 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~100. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 361/2026
UDAI SINGH SISODIA
.....Petitioner Through: Ms. S. Jaanani, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Deepak Goyal, Adv.
versus
ARVINDAR SINGH SAHNEY AND ORS .....Respondent Through: Ms. Vineeta Meharia, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Amit Meharia, Ms. Tannishtha Singh, Mr. Sambhav, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA
O R D E R %
09.03.2026
CM APPL. 13924/2026
1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. The application stands disposed of.
CONT.CAS(C) 361/2026 & CM APPL. 13925/2026
1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. The proceedings of this contempt petition have been instituted alleging disobedience of an order dated 28.05.2025 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court whereby the order under challenge therein was stayed with a further direction that the appellant therein shall calculate the differential of pension that may be payable in terms of the impugned This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/03/2026 at 12:49:07
judgment to the employees, including the arrears and the same shall be placed before the Court.
3. The submission of learned senior counsel for the petitioner is that though the Appellate Court has stayed the impugned judgment, however, the appellants therein were under an obligation to place the calculation of the differential of pension before the Court which they have not done.
4. For the aforesaid purpose, we are of the opinion, that a contempt petition would not be the appropriate remedy, rather, the petitioner ought to move an application before the Appellate Court where LPA 363/2025 is pending.
5. At this juncture, learned senior counsel for the petitioner prays that she may be permitted to withdraw the present contempt petition with liberty to approach the Appellate Court in the aforesaid LPA by way of moving an appropriate application.
6. Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for.
DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ
TEJAS KARIA, J MARCH 9, 2026 N.Khanna
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/03/2026 at 12:49:07