201 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: February 12, 2026 (i) RSA-3746-1998 (O&M) Jarnail Singh and others … Appellants Versus Pritpal Singh and others …Respondents * * * * (ii) RSA-3747-1998 (O&M) Jarnail Singh and others … Appellants Versus Pritpal Singh and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- None for the appellants. Mr. J.S. Jaidka and Mr. Abhishek Khullar, Advocates for respondent No.16. DEEPAK GUPTA , J.(Oral) Since learned counsel, who was represen ng the appellants, has pleaded no instruc ons as per order dated 15.10.2025, no ce to the appellants wad directed to be issued. As per report of the Registry, appellant No.1 has been duly served through son. Appellant Nos.3(i), 6(ii) and 7(i) have been served personally. Appellant Nos.2 and 4 have been served through daughter-in-law. Appellant Nos.3 (iii) has been served through mother. Appellant No.6(i) is served through wife. Appellant Nos.3(ii), 5 and 8 have expired. Thus, except appellant Nos.3(ii), 5 and 8, all the appellants have been served personally or through a family member, which is a valid service in the eyes of law. Despite this, there is no representa on on behalf of the appellants. No applica on is moved to bring on record the LRs of deceased-appellants. All these circumstances indicate that the appellants are no longer interested in pursuing this appeal. SARITA RANI 2026.02.12 17:16 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order RSA-3746-1998 (O&M) RSA-3747-1998 (O&M) - 2 - 2026:PHHC:021745 Dismissed in default for want of prosecu on. Photocopy of this order be placed on the connected case file. February 12, 2026 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SARITA RANI 2026.02.12 17:16 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order