Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16848 (MAD)

S.Krishnaveni v. The Commissioner of Police,

HCP/460/2026 · 2026-03-26

Anita Sumanth, Sunder Mohan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:MHC:1246 H.C.P.No.460 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26.03.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN H.C.P.No.460 of 2026 Mrs.S.Krishnaveni, F/75 Yrs. D/o. Late Chinnammal, W/o. Balachandar, Door No.608, 6th Main, 7th Cross, 1st Stage SJR School Behind, 3rd Block, HBR Layout, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka – 560 043. .. Petitioner vs 1.The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Chennai. 2.The Inspector of Police, Guindy Police Station, Chennai. .. Respondents Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of habeas corpus directing the respondents to produce the petitioner’s sister namely Tmt. Mayajothi, aged about 80 years, before this Court and set her at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Arun Kumar For Respondents : Mr.S.Raja Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr.M.Sylvester John 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis H.C.P.No.460 of 2026 ORDER (Made by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH, J.) In this habeas corpus petition the prayer is for production of Mayajothi (detenue), aged about 80 years. 2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has filed a status report dated 26.03.2026, upon perusal of which we find that the detenue has been missing since 27.03.2019. A complaint was made in CSR No. 295 of 2019 on 30.03.2019 and a case registered in the Guduvanchery Police Station in Cr.No.538 of 2019 for women missing on 21.06.2019 by the detenue’s husband. The search is stated to have been ongoing since then. The Inspector of Police, Gunidy Police Station, has stated that all measures are being taken to secure the detenue at the earliest. 3. A perusal of the affidavit filed in support of this petition reveals incidental reference to one, Tamilselvi, coupled with allegations that said Tamilselvi has illegally detained the detenue for the purpose of grabbing her properties. Neither Tamilselvi nor the husband of the detenue have been arrayed as parties. 4. In such circumstances, we do not attach credence to the allegations made in this habeas corpus petition. It would thus suffice for us to direct the respondent authorities to continue their efforts and secure 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis H.C.P.No.460 of 2026 the detenue at the earliest. 5. Recording the above, since we do not find any illegal detention of the detenue and neither has the petitioner made out a case for the same, this habeas corpus petition is closed. No costs. [A.S.M, J.] [S.M, J.] 26.03.2026 Neutral Citation:Yes ssm To 1.The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Chennai. 2.The Inspector of Police, Guindy Police Station, Chennai. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis H.C.P.No.460 of 2026 DR. ANITA SUMANTH,J. and SUNDER MOHAN,J. ssm 7 H.C.P.No.460 of 2026 26.03.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis