Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16846 (AP)

Pavuluri Rama Krishna v. M.SRINIVASA RAO

CC/34/2017 · 2026-02-05

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010069612017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 34/2017 Between: 1. PAVULURI RAMA KRISHNA,, S/O. MARKANDEYA SARMA, AGED 40 YEARS, OCC: JUNIOR ASSISTANT, R/O. PAVULURU ROAD, NEAR NSL TEXTILE, BESIDE UPP SCHOOL, INKOLLU, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. M SRINIVASA RAO, Executive Officer, Inkollu Group Temples, Inkollu, Prakasam District. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent herein for the willful, deliberate and wanton violation of the orders dt: 07.12.2016 of this Hon'ble Court made in WPMP No.52544/2016 in WP No.42621/2016 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(APPL 648 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to amend the cause title in respect of the respondent by deleting the name of Sri M. Srinivasa Rao by substituting the same by V. Madhusudhan Rao, Executive Officer of Inkollu Group Temples, Inkollu, Prakasam District" and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V S K RAMA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor: 2 1. A SREEKANTH REDDY(SC FOR ENDOW RS) The court made the following ORDER:- The contempt petition has been filed for non-compliance of the orders dated 07.12.2016 passed in W.P.M.P.No.52544 of 2016 in W.P.No.42641 of 2016. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri D. Rohit, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the respondent, submit that, subsequent to the filing of the contempt case, orders passed in W.P.M.P.No.52544 of 2016 in W.P.No.42641 of 2016 are complied with. 3. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. 5. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 06.02.2026 GVK 3 156 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE No.34 of 2017 Date: 06.02.2026 GVK