Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16844 (GAU)

CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. CHUTUMA TANTI AND ANR A

I.A.(Civil)/3168/2026 · 2026-10-08

Mridul Kumar Kalita

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010189272024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3168/2026 CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD HAVING ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT AASTHA PLAZAR, OPP. SB DEORAH COLLEGE, 4TH FLOOR, BORA SERVICE, GUWAHATI, DIST KAMRUP M ASSAM, REP BY ITS DEPUTY MANAGER LEGAL CLAIMS LEGAL, MR. KAIFI ANAM. VERSUS CHUTUMA TANTI AND ANR A D/O SRI GAJEN TANTI RESIDENT OF TAIRAM T.E BANDAR CHALIA, TANTI GAON, PO AND PS TITABOR DIST JORHAT, ASSAM PRESENT ADDRESS KARUNATING TEA ESTATE, PO DABIDUBI KHUMTAI, DIST GOLAGHAT, ASSAM 785611 2:SRI BIJOY DHANUWAR S/O SRI GURIUS DHANUWAR RESIDENT OF NOLONIPATHAR SARUPATHAR PO AND PS SARUPATHAR DIST GOLAGHAT ASSAM 78560 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A BHATTACHARYYA, Advocate for the Respondent : , Linked Case : MFA/84/2026 Page No.# 2/3 CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD HAVING ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT AASTHA PLAZAR OPP. SB DEORAH COLLEGE 4TH FLOOR BORA SERVICE GUWAHATI DIST KAMRUP M ASSAM REP BY ITS DEPUTY MANAGER LEGAL CLAIMS LEGAL MR. KAIFI ANAM. VERSUS CHUTUMA TANTI AND ANR D/O SRI GAJEN TANTI RESIDENT OF TAIRAM T.E BANDAR CHALIA TANTI GAON PO AND PS TITABOR DIST JORHAT ASSAM PRESENT ADDRESS KARUNATING TEA ESTATE PO DABIDUBI KHUMTAI DIST GOLAGHAT ASSAM 785611 2:SRI BIJOY DHANUWAR S/O SRI GURIUS DHANUWAR RESIDENT OF NOLONIPATHAR SARUPATHAR PO AND PS SARUPATHAR DIST GOLAGHAT ASSAM 785601 ------------ Advocate for : MR. A BHATTACHARYYA Advocate for : appearing for CHUTUMA TANTI AND ANR BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER 09.10.2026 Page No.# 3/3 1. Heard Mr. A Bhattacharyya, the learned counsel for the appellant/ appellant. 2. On perusal of office note dated 07.10.2026, it appears that the notice issued to the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 by speed post have been duly delivered to the addressee. As such, said notices are held to be duly served. 3. The records of trial court have not yet received. 4. As such, issue reminder for the same. 5. As such, this appeal is ready for hearing. 6. However, since no one has appeared for the OP in the IA (civil) No. 3168/2026, the interim order of stay issued on 14.09.2026 by this court is hereby made absolute during the pendency of the MFA No. 84/2026 and the said Interlocutory Application is disposed of. 7. List the matter again on 20.11.2026. JUDGE Comparing Assistant