Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16844 (DEL)

SUNNY GUPTA & ORS. v. STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

W.P.(CRL)/750/2026 · 2026-09-01

Girish Kathpalia

Writ Petition (Criminal)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(CRL) 750/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages $~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 01.09.2026 # CNR No. DLHC010085522026 + W.P.(CRL) 750/2026 & CRL.M.A. 7161/2026 SUNNY GUPTA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Kashish and Mr. Nikhil Bhasin, Advocates with petitioners in person. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anand V. Khatri, ASC for the State with SI Anil. Respondent no.2 in person. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 19/2019 of PS Seemapuri for offence under Section 498A/406/34/506 IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has compromised the disputes with the petitioners. 2. Learned ASC for State assisted by IO/SI Anil accepts notice and submits that he has no objection to this petition. GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569 af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1557099 6b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.09.01 17:14:20 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:01.09.2026 17:17:25 Signature Not Verified W.P.(CRL) 750/2026 Page 2 of 2 pages 3. Respondent no.2, present in Court and identified by the IO, also accepts notice. 4. Keeping in mind the nature of dispute, I have spoken with respondent no. 2 in Court and it is stated by her that she has settled all matrimonial disputes with the petitioners. It is also stated by her that for past more than one year, she is living with the petitioners happily. From wedlock of petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2, two children were born and they also are living happily with the petitioners. That being so, respondent no. 2 submits that now she does not wish to continue prosecution of petitioners. 5. In view of the above circumstances, I am satisfied that it would be in the interest of justice not to push the parties through full dress trial. 6. Therefore, the petition is allowed and FIR No. 19/2019 of Police Station Seemapuri for offence under Section 498A/406/34/506 IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act as well as proceedings arising out of the same are quashed. Accompanying application also stands disposed of. GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) SEPTEMBER 1, 2026 ‘rs’ GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4a fec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cac ca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5 d15570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c48796 5ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.09.01 17:14:04 +05'30' By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:01.09.2026 17:17:25