APHC010072012023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 954/2023 Between: 1. BOREDDY SIVASANKAR REDDY, S/O. SIVARAMI REDDY, CHINNADUDYALA VILLAGE, MUDDANUR MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI C M SAIKANTH VARMA, THE JOINT COLLECTOR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. SRI M SRINIVASULU, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, JAMMALAMADUGU 3. SRI G VENKATESWARLU, THE TAHSILDAR, MUDDANUR 4. SRI BUMIREDDY CHINNA NAGI REDDY NALUGOVA NAGI REDDY, S/O. NAGI REDDY, H.NO. 1/86, CHINNADUDYALA VILLAGE, MUDDANUR MANDAL 5. SRI BHUMIREDDY BALA NAGI REDDY, S/O. BUMIREDDY CHINNA NAGI REDDY @ NALUGOVA NAGI REDDY, H.NO. 1/86, CHINNADUDYALA VILLAGE, MUDDANUR MANDAL ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents for deliberately and willfuly disobeying the orders passed in WP No. 269 of 2021 dated 06.01.2021 of this Hon'ble Court passed by his Lordship Hon'ble justice D.Ramesh under the contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KODATI RAMYA KRISHNA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. T BALASWAMI 2. SODUM ANVESHA The Court made the following Order: 1. This contempt case is filed by the petitioner/ respondent No.5 in the W.P.No.269 of 2021 against the respondent Nos.1 to 4 and petitioners therein for willful disobedience of the interim order dated 06.01.2021 passed in W.P.No.269 of 2021 by this Court. 2. The Petitioner herein had filed W.P.No.1003 of 2019 and the said writ petition was allowed. Against the same, W.P.No.269 of 2021 was filed by contemnor Nos.4 and 5, and this Court, after considering their contentions, passed an interim order directing to maintain status quo. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, it was brought to the notice of this Court that the W.P.No.269 of 2021 has been disposed of, directing the respondents to consider and dispose of the revision filed by the petitioners in W.P.No.1003 of 2019, after affording an opportunity of hearing the parties, and to maintain status quo till the disposal of the said revision. 4. In view of the above submissions, nothing survives for adjudication in the present case. 5. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date :12.03.2026 JLSR