Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1684 (PNJ)

PALE RAM v. SUMITA MISHRA, IAS

COCP/1425/2026 · 2026-04-16

Harpreet Kaur Jeewan

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 Sr. No.111 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1425-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 16th April 2026 PALE RAM .....…Petitioner versus SUMITA MISHRA, IAS ........Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN Present: Mr. Parveen Moudgil, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, Addl. A.G., Haryana, for the respondent. HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the respondent informs that the order dated 16.01.2026 (Annexure P-1), passed in CWP-819-2026, stands complied with as a Speaking Order dated 08.04.2026 has been passed by the Additional Chief Secretary, Government of Haryana, Health Department, Chandigarh. Copy of the said order has been submitted in the Court today, which is taken on record. A copy thereof has also been supplied to the counsel opposite. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition. However, he seeks liberty to assail the correctness of the aforesaid Speaking Order dated 08.04.2026, if so required. 3. Consequently, the present contempt petition stands disposed of with aforesaid liberty. 4. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. (HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN) JUDGE 16th April 2026 simran Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SIMRANDEEP KAUR 2026.04.16 16:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document