Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16835 (KAR)

THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION v. SRI MOHAMMAD JAFER

WP/8391/2022 · 2026-03-14

Lok Adalath

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE & SRI. M.N.UMASHANKAR, MEMBER W.P.No.8391/2022 (L-PG) (Lok Adalath No.944/2026) BETWEEN THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION BENGALURU CENTRAL DIVISION BY IT'S CHIEF LAW OFFICER, K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 027. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. R B ANEPPANAVAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . SRI.MOHAMMAD JAFER, S/O LATE ABDUL RAHIM, RESIDING AT NO.3, 1ST CROSS, TVS SHOWROOM,BEHIND BATUL UNNISA LAYOUT, HOSUR MAIN ROAD, ANEKAL TOWN, BENGALURU DISTRICT - 562 106. 2. THE LABOUR OFFICER & Digitally signed by DEEPU M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 2 CONTROLLING AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972, DIVISION-6, BENGALURU. 3. THE ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER & APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT 1972, DIVISION - 6, BENGALURU - 560 029. ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.KANTHARAJA V, ADVOCATE FOR R1; AGA FOR R2 & R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 27.04.2021 PASSED BY THE R3 APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT 1972 AND ASSISTANT LABOUT COMMISSIONER, DIVISION 6 BENGALURU PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-D AND BY CONFIRMING THE EXPARTE ORDER PASSED BY THE R2 LABOUR OFFICER AND CONTROLLING AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972, DIVISION 6, BENGALURU PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-B. THE PETITION COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER The petition is filed by the Corporation assailing the award dated 27.04.2021 in Sa Ka Aa Ben-4/APGA/CR-7/2020-21 on the file of The Assistant Labour Commissioner & Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Bengaluru and confirm the order dated 06.12.2019 in No.Ka Ba-6/PGA/CR-34/2017-18 3 passed by the Labour Officer and Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Division -6, Bengaluru. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent No.1 are present. 3. Parties to the proceeding have signed the joint memo reporting settlement. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner/Corporation and respondent No.1/employee would submit that the dispute is settled and the parties have reduced the terms of the settlement in the joint memo. 5. The joint memo reads as under:- "JOINT MEMO The WP filed against the order in ALC-4/APGA/CR-7/2020-21 dated 24.07.2021 at PGA/CR/No.34/2017-18 dated 06/12/2019 passed by the Gratuity Authorities has been settled between the parties on the following terms and the award may kindly be modified as under: 1. The petitioner-Corporation has agreed to pay the Gratuity Amount of Rs.1,90,000/- including interest in full and final settlement of the case. 2. The respondent agreed to receive the above stated amount as full and final settlement. 3. The excess gratuity amount deposited by the Corporation should be refunded to corporation. 4 4. The parties to the proceedings have agreed for the above terms. 6. This Court does not find any impediment to accept the terms of the settlement. 7. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. The impugned award dated 27.04.2021 in No.Sa Ka Aa Ben- 4/APGA/CR-7/2020-21 on the file of The Assistant Labour Commissioner & Appellate Authority and the order dated 06.12.2019 in Ka Ba-6/PGA/CR-34/2017-18 passed by the Labour Officer and Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Division - 6, Bengaluru are modified in terms of the joint memo. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER brn