Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16832 (BOM)

GAJENDRAN S. v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

IA/3548/2026 · 2026-10-08

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

933 TO 936.IA-3460.26 & ORS.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION (933) INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3460 OF 2026 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1665 OF 2026 Venkata Bhaskara Rao Maddala … Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …. Respondents WITH (934) INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3496 OF 2026 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1664 OF 2026 Venkata Bhaskara Rao Maddala … Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …. Respondents WITH (935) INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3548 OF 2026 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1674 OF 2026 Gajendran S. … Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …. Respondents WITH (936) INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3549 OF 2026 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1673 OF 2026 Gajendran S. … Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …. Respondents ______________________ Mr. Vikrant M. Pandey a/w Mr. Utkarsh M. Shukla i/by Hedgehog & Fox LLP, for the Applicant. Page 1 PPN PRACHI PRANESH NANDIWADEKAR Digitally signed by PRACHI PRANESH NANDIWADEKAR Date: 2026.10.09 11:42:29 +0530 933 TO 936.IA-3460.26 & ORS.DOC Mr. P. P. Jadhav, APP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Nimeet Sharma i/by MZM Legal LLP, for Respondent No.2- National Spot Exchange Limited. ______________________ CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 8 OCTOBER 2026 P. C. :- 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Applicant and learned counsel appearing for the Respondents. 2. For the reasons set out in the Interim Applications, same are allowed in terms of prayer clauses (b) and (c) by extending till 14 October 2026, the time granted by this court by order dated 8 September 2026. 3. Accordingly, all Interim Applications are disposed of. [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] Page 2 PPN