- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13510 WP No. 3574 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 3574 OF 2022 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. M/S YOGESHWAR AGENCIES REP BY ITS PARTNER MR ARUN B BETAGERI 2. MR ARUN B BETAGERI S/O BASAVANNAPPA BETAGERI AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS PARTNER M/S YOGESHWAR AGENCIES 3. MR GIRISH B BETAGERI S/O BASAVANNAPPA BETAGERI AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS PARTNER M/S YOGESHWAR AGENCIES ALL ARE AT SHOP NO 8210 CHANDRAVADAN PLAZA 2ND FLOOR BEHIND VIJAYA TALKIES VIJAYA ROAD DHARWAD - 580001 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAMESHA B M.,ADVOCATE, SRI. D. S. ANKALAKOTI D.S, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13510 WP No. 3574 of 2022 AND: 1. BANK OF BARODA DHARWAD MAIN BRANCH GURUPRASAD BUILDING KEMPAGERI LANE DHARWAD - 580001 REP BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER MR BASAVARAJ M BELLAD HEAD OFFICE AT NO 112 J C ROAD BANGALORE - 560002 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. VIGNESH SHETTY, ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 30.04.2021 ON I.A.NO.3324/2019 IN O.A.NO.595/2019 PASSED BY THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-1 KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE, AT ANNEXURE- U, CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE APPLICATION IN I.A.NO.3324/2019 IN OA.NO.595/2019 FILED BY THE PETITIONERS. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13510 WP No. 3574 of 2022 ORAL ORDER This is a writ petition of the year 2022. When the matter came up before this Court on 22.02.2022, this Court had directed this matter to be listed after compliance of office objections. Thereafter, on 04.03.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners and this Court directed the matter to be posted under the caption 'for dismissal'. 2. Today when the matter came up there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that the petitioners are not interested to pursue the matter. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE RB