APHC010072262019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 3224/2019 Between: 1. SK MUNNA BASHA, S/O. RABBANI BASHA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O. H.NO.3/535, J-3, BAIRMAL STREET, NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NANDYAL I TOWN POLICE STATION, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the 3rd Respondent as illegal and arbitrary in not taking action on the complaint dated 27.09.2018 given by the petitioner herein and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent to register a Crime and investigating to the same basing on the complaint given by the petitioner herein 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd Respondent to register a Crime on the complaint given by the petitioner herein dated 27.09.2018, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K.S.G. PADMAVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.3224 OF 2019 ORDER: None appeared for the writ petitioner though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Earlier also, there was no representation for the writ petitioner. 2. Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on the earlier adjournment would submit that the complaint filed by the petitioner was rejected by the Human Rights Commission. He did not approach the proper forum challenging the order of the Human Rights Commission, instead, he filed the present writ petition with false allegations. 3. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 10.02.2026 Dmr 4 83 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:3224 OF 2019 Date: 10.02.2026 Dmr