Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16826 (CHH)

SURENDRA BECHAN MISHRA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/3051/2025 · 2026-01-30

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:5407-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 3051 of 2025 Surendra Bechan Mishra S/o Bechan Mishra Aged About 56 Years R/o M-11, 1/2 Gyaneswar Bhawan, Rajaji Path, Dombiwali (E), District - Thane Maharashtra ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station - Sirgitti, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 2 - Yusuf Ali Bharmal S/o Shaukat Ali Aged About 34 Years R/o Khaparganj, Police Station - City Kotwali, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohammad Parvez Khan, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shailendra Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 31.01.2026 1. Heard Mr. Mohammad Parvez Khan, learned counsel for the MANPREET KAUR Digitally signed by MANPREET KAUR Date: 2026.01.31 17:35:07 +0530 2 petitioners. Also heard Mr. Shailendra Sharma, learned Panel Lawyer for respondent No.1 / State. 2. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for following relief:- “It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the first information report bearing Crime No. 157/2025 dated 30.03.2025, registered at Police Station Sirgitti, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) for the offences under Sections 420, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned State counsel submits that during the pendency of the present petition, charge-sheet has already been filed on 24.12.2025 and further, the case is listed on 28.02.2026 before the learned trial court for appearance of accused. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh challenging the charge-sheet. 5. In view of the same, as prayed by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to take recourse to law. 6. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner after obtaining the photocopy of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Manpreet