SRI CHANDI RAM NATH v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS
WP(C)/2274/2026 · 2026-10-13
N Unni Krishnan Nair
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16825 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16825 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010288242025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2274/2026 SRI CHANDI RAM NATH SON OF SRI SANKESWAR NATH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE UPENDRA NAGAR P.O.- PRATAKHATA DISTRICT- KOKRAJHAR, BTC, ASSAM PIN NO.- 783337 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.
OF ASSAM ENVIRONMENT AND FOREST DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI PIN 781006 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI PIN 781006 3:THE ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL SECRETARY BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL KOKRAJHAR PIN- 783370 4:THE CONSERVATOR OF FOREST CUM CHD BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL KOKRAJHAR PIN- 783370 5:THE ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST CUM CHD BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL KOKRAJHAR PIN- 783370 6:THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER SOCIAL FORESTRY DIVISION KOKRAJHAR PIN- 783370
Page No.# 2/2 7:THE RANGE OFFICER SOCIAL FORESTRY RANGE FAKIRAGRAM KOKRAJHAR PIN- 78334 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR G BAISHYA, MD. A HASSAN,MR. D RABHA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, BTC, SC, FOREST,SC, FINANCE DEPTT.
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 14-10-2026 Heard Mr. A. Hassan, learned counsel for the petitioner who submits that the petitioner had taken adjournment, on the last date of listing, to amend the present writ petition. However, he submits that he is under instruction to withdraw the present writ petition and file afresh incorporating all the requisite particulars. Accordingly, he prays that he be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to re-file the same. The prayer is not objected to by the learned counsel for the respondent. In view of the above, the present writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal with liberty as prayed for.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant