MONIL KISHAN PAREKH AND ANR v. ESHA RAJDEEP MALIK AND ANR
APL/526/2025 · 2026-10-08
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16825 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16825 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
150.APL.526.2025.doc HARSHADA H. SAWANT (P.A.)
IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.526 OF 2025 Monil Kishan Parekh And Anr. .. Applicants Versus Esha Rajdeep Malik And Anr. .. Respondents .................... Mr. Niteen Pradhan a/w. Ms. Shubhada Khot, Mr. Danish Patel and Ms. Shamshavi Desai, Advocates i/by Ms. Aneeta Kuttikrishnan for Applicant. Ms. Esha Malik, Respondent No.1 present in-person. Mr. Yogesh M. Nakhwa, APP for Respondent – State. PSI – Satish Chavan, Matunga Police Station. ................... CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : OCTOBER 08, 2026 P.C.
:
1. Heard Mr. Pradhan, learned Advocate for Applicants; Respondent No.1 in-person and Mr. Nakhwa, learned APP for Respondent.
2. The lis is emanating from proceeding under Section 498-A and other allied Sections stands withdrawn. Complainant is present before me and she would submit that she is agreeable for consent quashing.
3. Her Consent Affidavit has been filed by her which is dated
08.10.2026. In that view of the matter, I have no reason to disbelieve the same.
4. The present Application therefore stands allowed in terms of 1 of 2
150.APL.526.2025.doc prayer clause (a) which reads thus:-
“(a) That I am Applicant No.1 in the above matter and I am well conversant with facts and circumstances of the present case, hence I am competent to swear this affidavit.”
5. No order as to costs.
6. Criminal Application is allowed and disposed.
H. H. SAWANT [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] 2 of 2 HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT Digitally signed by HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT Date: 2026.10.09 15:00:13 +0530