Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16823 (RAJ)

JEETU KUMAR PRAJAPAT S/O SHRI KANARAM PRAJAPAT v. RAJASTHAN STAFF SELECTION BOARD

CW/2502/2026 · 2026-02-09

Anand Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:6040] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2502/2026 Jeetu Kumar Prajapat S/o Shri Kanaram Prajapat, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Resident Of Vpo Thikariya, Tehsil Sanganer, Ajmer Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302026 (Application No. 202542209225) (Roll No. 587822) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Secretary, State Institute Of Agriculture Management Premises, Shreeji Nagar, Prithviraj Colony, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan- 302018. 2. The Chairman, Board Of Revenue For Rajasthan, Ajmer, Gokhale Lane, Opp. Collectorate Office Basant Vihar, Todarmal Marg, Civil Lines, Ajmer, Rajasthan 305001. 3. Deputy Registrar (Administrative Wing), Board Of Revenue For Rajasthan, Ajmer, Gokhale Lane, Opp. Collectorate Office Basant Vihar, Todarmal Marg, Civil Lines, Ajmer, Rajasthan 305001 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tushar Panwar Ms. Vinita Saini Mr. Rohit Kumar Mahrda For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 09/02/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has secured 170.56 marks, whereas the cut off for OBC LD/CP in the examination for the post of Patwari (Direct Recruitment) 2025 are much lesser, yet his candidature has been rejected indicating his percentage of disability only 27%. Learned counsel also produced the disability certificate dated 25.10.2017, wherein the petitioner is found to have 40% Locomotor Disability. 2. Learned counsel submits that he may be granted liberty to get his disability examined by the medical experts of AIIMS, [2026:RJ-JP:6040] (2 of 2) [CW-2502/2026] Jodhpur and on the basis of such result of re-medical examination the Competent Authority may be directed to take further actions. 3. Although, in the matters of disputed question of facts, this Court generally does not accept the writ petition, however, only on account of considerable variance between two disability certificates, one issued by Medical Authority, Jaipur, Rajasthan dated 25.10.2017 and second by the respondents in impugned order, this Court grants liberty to the petitioner to get himself examined for the purpose of ascertaining his Locomotor Disability by the experts of AIIMS, Jodhpur. In case, the petitioner submits an application within a period of 7 days along with the demand draft of Rs.10,000/- in favour of Superintendent of AIIMS, Jodhpur then Superintendent of AIIMS, Jodhpur shall constitute a Medical Board for examining the extent and nature of Locomotor Disability of the petitioner within a period of 7 days thereafter. In case, the medical experts of AIIMS, Jodhpur certifies that the petitioner is possessing required Benchmark disability, then on the basis of such report, the petitioner shall make a representation before the respondents, who shall consider and decide the same strictly in accordance with law. 4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case. 5. The Writ Petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of. 6. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/78