Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16818 (RAJ)

RAMESH SANKHALA S/O SHRI SEDDURAM SANKHLA v. JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED

CW/2786/2026 · 2026-02-12

Bipin Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:6608] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2786/2026 Ramesh Sankhala S/o Shri Sedduram Sankhla, Aged About 53 Years, Resident Of Makan No. 26, First Floor, Vinoba Nagar, Sector-15 Ke Pass, Girdhar Hospital Ke Pas, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Headquarter Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur Through Managing Director. 2. Karyalaya Assistant Engineer-D-Third, Jaipur Vidhut Vitran Nigam Limited, Malviya Nagar, Sector-3, Jaipur Through Assistant Engineer-D-Third. 3. Ghanshyam Sankhala S/o Shri Sedduram Sankhala, Aged About 43 Years, Resident Of Makan No. 26, Ground Floor, Vinoba Nagar, Sector-15 Ke Pass, Girdhar Hospital Ke Pass, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.M. Jain For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 12/02/2026 1. Without pressing the writ petition on merits, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has assailed the order dated 14.11.2025, passed by learned Additional District and Session Judge, No. 4, Jaipur Metropolitan I, whereby an interim temporary injunction order directing not to disconnect the electricity connection has been passed. [2026:RJ-JP:6608] (2 of 2) [CW-2786/2026] 2. He further submits that temporary injunction application is still pending adjudication and the reply has been submitted by the defendant. 2. He therefore, submits that the learned Trial Court may be directed to decide the temporary injunction application as early as possible without being influenced by the order dated 14.11.2025. 3. Heard. 4. This Court deems it appropriate to direct the learned Trial Court to decide the temporary injunction application within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order, if the service on defendant is complete and without being influenced by the order dated 14.11.2025. 5. With the aforesaid observations, the present Civil Writ Petition stands disposed of. 6. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (BIPIN GUPTA),J KRATIKA/PRATEEK/10