Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16818 (JHR)

GUDDU ANSARI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5357/2026 · 2026-06-17

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:17529] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5357 of 2026 ------ Guddu Ansari, aged about 50 years, Son of Late Md. Iliyas, Resident of village – Jhiktiha, P.O.- Barharwa, P.S.- Ranga, District- Sahibganj, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Srivastava, Addl. P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-17-06-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Ranga P.S. Case No.26 of 2023 (S.T. No.78 of 2026) registered for the offences punishable under Section 302, 201, 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in criminal conspiracy with the co- accused persons, committed the murder of the husband of the informant namely Subal Kumar Dutta and caused disappearance of the evidence of the murder. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. yet he has been implicated in this case only on the basis of the statement of the co- accused namely Daya Shankar Saha before the police and the said co- accused Daya Shankar Saha has already been admitted to bail by a co- ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 09.09.2024 passed in B.A. No.7879 of 2024. It is also submitted that charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 15.12.2025 as has been mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Rajmahal in connection with Ranga P.S. Case No.26 of 2023 (S.T. No.78 of 2026) with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-17.06.2026-Animesh/