PRIYANKA CHULET W/O SHRI ANKIT AGARWAL, D/O SHIV DAYAL CHULET v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLW/198/2026 · 2026-02-03
Bhuwan Goyal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16815 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16815 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:5109] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 198/2026
1. Priyanka Chulet W/o Shri Ankit Agarwal, D/o Shiv Dayal Chulet, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Baleshwar Mohalla, Ward No. 19, Reengus, Jaitusar, Sikar, Rajasthan-332404 Presently Resident Of Flat No. F-103, Max Heights, Suncity, Sikar Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Ankit Agarwal S/o Raj Kumar Agarwal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Main Bazar, Mundru, Sikar, Rajasthan - 332712 Presently Resident Of Flat No. F-103, Max Heights, Suncity, Sikar Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan Police, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3. The Superintendent Of Police, Jaipur (Rural), Jaipur, Rajasthan.
4. Station House Office, Police Station Harmara, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
5. The Superintendent Of Police, District Sikar (Rajasthan).
6. Station House Office, Police Station Reengus, District Sikar (Rajasthan),
7. Station House Office, Police Station Sri Madhopur, District Sikar Rajasthan
8. Shakuntla Chulet (Mother), R/o Baleshwar Mohalla, Ward No. 19, Reengus, Jaitusar, Sikar, Rajastha-332404
9. Murari Lal Sharma (Brother), R/o Baleshwar Mohalla, Ward No. 19, Reengus, Jaitusar, Sikar, Rajastha-332404
10. Lakshmi Sharma W/o Murari Lal Sharma(Sister In Law), R/o Baleshwar Mohalla, Ward No. 19, Reengus, Jaitusar, Sikar, Rajastha-332404
11. Sushil Sharma (Brother), R/o Baleshwar Mohalla, Ward No. 19, Reengus, Jaitusar, Sikar, Rajastha-332404
12. Bhupati Chulet (Brother), R/o Baleshwar Mohalla, Ward
[2026:RJ-JP:5109] (2 of 3) [CRLW-198/2026] No. 19, Reengus, Jaitusar, Sikar, Rajastha-332404
13. Akshay Chulet (Brother), R/o Baleshwar Mohalla, Ward No. 19, Reengus, Jaitusar, Sikar, Rajastha-332404 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bhawani Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, Dy.GA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order 03/02/2026
1. Defect pointed out by the Registry are overruled.
2. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos. 8 to 13 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners solemnized their marriage on 28.01.2026 at Arya Samaj Santha,4/14C Joshi Bhawan, E.W.S.J.D.A. Quarter, R.P.A. Road, Naya Khera, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan and same has been registered before the Marriage Registration Officer, Vidhyadhar Nagar Zone, Jaipur, Rajasthan. A copy of the petitioners’ marriage registration certificate has been annexed with the petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos. 8 to 13 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection.
[2026:RJ-JP:5109] (3 of 3) [CRLW-198/2026]
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance upon the
judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522.
5. Learned Dy. Government Advocate has opposed the same.
6. Both the petitioners are present in person today in the court. Their signatures have been obtained on the court’s order sheet and they have been duly identified by their counsel.
7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners are directed to file an appropriate application seeking protection before the concerned SHO, who in turn, is
directed that if such an application is filed before him, he will provide adequate protection to the petitioners as per law and ensure that no harm is caused to them.
8. The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
9. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand
disposed of.
10. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any pending in the present matter.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J Anu /251