NIKHIL MAHADEV CHANDE AND ORS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
APL/387/2026 · 2026-10-08
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16815 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16815 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
156.APL.387.2026.doc HARSHADA H. SAWANT (P.A.)
IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.387 OF 2026 Nikhil Mahadev Chande And Ors. .. Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. .. Respondents .................... Mr. Rajesh P. Khobragade a/w. Ms. Gayatri H. Nayak, Mr. Akash Tayade, Mr. Raj Gupta, Ms. Lubhda Bhoir and Mr. Vinit V. Dhotre, Advocates for Applicants. Ms. Sangeeta E. Phad, APP for Respondent No.1. API – Sanjay Rathod, Uran Police Station, Navi Mumbai. ...................
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : OCTOBER 08, 2026 P.C.
:
1. Heard Mr. Khobragade, learned Advocate for Applicants and Ms. Phad, learned APP for Respondent No.1.
2. Parties have reconciled their dispute. The issues are family dispute arising out of proceedings under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and other allied provisions.
3. The Consent Affidavit of the Complainant dated 08.10.2026 is filed and taken on record. To the Consent Terms between the parties about reconciliation of the other disputes are appended to the Consent Affidavit.
4. There can be no impediment in allowing the Application. I interact with the parties in Court. The Application stands allowed and 1 of 2
156.APL.387.2026.doc
disposed in terms of prayer clause (a) which reads thus:-
“a) It's alleged that the First Informant is residing at 104, Kusum Anant, Plot No. 12, Middle class Society, Panvel with her family members. It's further alleged that the first informant's parent was searching bride groom, hence they have visited website namely Pavitra Vivah, on the said website the First Informant's elder brother namely Prathamesh liked the proposal of Applicant No.1. Hence, he approached the Applicant No.2 being father of the Applicant No.1.”
5. No order as to costs.
6. Criminal Application is allowed and disposed.
H. H. SAWANT [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] 2 of 2 HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT Digitally signed by HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT Date: 2026.10.09 16:22:49 +0530