Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16814 (KAR)

SRI.NINGAPPA v. SRI.S.V.SHANKARA REDDY

RFA/77/2021 · 2026-03-12

Anu Sivaraman, Tara Vitasta Ganju

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14834-DB RFA No. 77 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.77 OF 2021 (SP) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. NINGAPPA S/O PATEL SIDDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS 2. SMT. KAMALAMMA W/O NINGAPPAA, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS 3. SMT. N. ANNAPOORNA D/O NINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS 4. SRI. SADASHIVA S/O NINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 5. SRI KUMARA S/O NINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS 6. SRI SHIVAMURTHY N. S/O NINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS Digitally signed by PAVITHRA N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14834-DB RFA No. 77 of 2021 APPELLANT NOS.1 TO 6 ARE THE R/O VUCHANAHALLI VILLAGE, SHEELANERE HOBLI, K. R. PET TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT-571 426 (APPELLANTS NOT CLAIMING BENEFITS OF SENIOR CITIZEN) …APPELLANTS (BY SMT. NANDINI B., ADV. FOR SRI. BHARGAV G., ADVOCATE) AND: SRI.S.V.SHANKARA REDDY S/O LATE S. N. VENKATA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/AT DOOR NO 4, 7TH BLOCK, SBM COLONY, 2ND STAGE, SRIRAMPURA, MYSURU CITY-570 008. NOW R/O FLAT NO.004, D. S. MAX SAMBRAM APTS, 5TH CROSS, MUNESHWARA LAYOUT, HARALUKUNTE, BENGALURU-560 068 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. KUMARA K. G., ADVOCATE FOR R1) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 04.08.2020 PASSED IN O.S.NO.49/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, K.R.PET, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14834-DB RFA No. 77 of 2021 CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) A memo is filed by the learned counsel appearing for the appellants seeking dismissal of the appeal as not pressed since the matter is settled out of the Court. 2. The said memo is taken on record. 3. The Regular First Appeal is dismissed as not pressed. 4. The Registry is directed to refund the eligible court fee to the appellant No.1 on proper identification. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE RAK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11