Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16813 (JHR)

RANJEET DAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.A(DB)/578/2026 · 2026-06-17

Arun Kumar Rai, Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Civil Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:17578-DB ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 578 of 2026 Ranjeet Das …. …. Appellant Versus State of Jharkhand …. …. …. Respondent --- CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay Hon’ble Mr. justice Arun Kumar Rai For the Appellant: Mr. Md. Ayub Ansari, Advocate For the Resp.-State: Spl. P.P. --- 03/ 17.06.2026 Heard Mr. Md. Ayub Ansari, learned Counsel for the appellant and learned Spl. P.P. 2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 10.02.2026 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge- V, Giridih in connection with M.C.A.No. 351/2026, arising out of Giridih (M) P.S. Case No. 92/2025 whereby and whereunder the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected. 3. It has been alleged that the appellant had enticed away the daughter of the informant who was subsequently recovered from Bokaro Railway Station. 4. Submission has been advanced by the learned Counsel for the appellant that the appellant is in custody since 25.11.2025. ( 2026:JHHC:17578-DB ) 5. It has further been submitted that no medical examination was done on the refusal on the part of the victim to undergo such examination. 6. Learned Spl. P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the appellant. He has further referred to paragraph 48 of the case diary which gives the gist of the 183 BNSS statement of the victim from which it appears that the appellant on the pretext of marriage was taking the victim to Tamilnadu but on the way on a complaint made by the father of the victim, the Police had apprehended the appellant as well the victim from Bokaro Railway Station. 7. Regard being had to the 183 BNSS statement of the victim, we while setting aside the order dated 10.02.2026 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-V, Giridih in M.C.A. No. 351/2026, arising out of Giridih (M) P.S. Case No. 92/2025 direct that the appellant be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge-V, Giridih in S.T.No.37/2026, arising out of Giridih (M) P.S. Case No. 92/2025. ( 2026:JHHC:17578-DB ) 8. This appeal is allowed. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J) (Arun Kumar Rai, J.) 17th June, 2026 P.K.S. Uploaded