Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16811 (PNJ)

SUMAN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/5440/2026 · 2026-05-07

Manisha Batra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-5440 IN THE (151 SUMAN AND STATE OF CORAM: Present: MANISHA B 1. Constitution o the official res petitioners at t representation 2. submitted tha 06.05.2026 be P-5) raising th same has not y 5440-2026 (O&M) (1) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH (151) Da AND ANOTHER Versus PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MA Mr. Vineet Sachdeva, Advocate f Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior D ****  HA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been fil tion of India seeking issuance of a w ial respondents No.2 and 3 to protec rs at the hands of respondent No.4 to tation dated 06.05.2026 (Annexure P At the very outset, learned coun d that the petitioners have recently 26 before the Senior Superintendent o sing their grievances as mentioned in s not yet been considered and no action JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRWP-5440-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 07.05.2026 ... Petitioners ...Respondents E MANISHA BATRA  cate for the petitioners nior DAG, Punjab een filed under Article 226 of the of a writ of mandamus directing protect the life and liberty of the o.4 to 6 and to take action on their ure P-5). d counsel for the petitioners has cently filed a representation on dent of Police, Patiala (Annexure ned in the present petition but the action has been taken thereon. AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.08 09:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-5440 He further sub appropriate Superintenden filed by the pe 3. 4. notice on beha be done in due her during the 5. commenting a disposed of at aforesaid rep petitioners wit order in accord petitioners, the in order to pro  07.05.2026 Amit Sharma 5440-2026 (O&M) (2) er submitted that at this stage, the peti iate directions are issued to tendent of Police, Patiala to decide t the petitioners and take necessary act Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior n behalf of the respondents-State and s in due course. Let a complete set of th the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer mad ting anything on the merits of the c of at this stage with a direction to res d representation dated 06.05.2026 rs within a period of 15 days from to accordance with law. Needless to say, rs, the official respondents would pro to protect their life and liberty. Whether speaking/reasoned:    he petitioners would be satisfied if to respondent No.2-Senior cide the aforesaid representation ry action thereon. Senior DAG, Punjab has advance e and submits that the needful will et of the paperbook be supplied to r made by the petitioners, without f the case, the present petition is to respondent No.2 to decide the .2026 (Annexure P-5) of the rom today, by passing a speaking to say, if any threat is found to the ld provide them adequate security (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE  ned:- Yes/No   AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.08 09:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.