Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16809 (AP)

Jammu Ramu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/35535/2014 · 2026-03-08

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010070812014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 35535/2014 Between: 1.JAMMU RAMU, S/O. RAMU NAIDU, AGE : 31 YEARS, OCC: FIELD ASSISTANT (UNDER TERMINATION), R/O. JAMMU VILLAGE, GURLA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS DISTRICT COLLECTOR/ DISTRICT PROGRAMME CO-ORDINATOR, MGNREGS, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, AT VIZIANAGARAM. 2.THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, AT VIZIANAGARAM. 3.THE MPDO / PROGRAMME OFFICER, MGNREGS, GURLA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declaring the proceedings in Rc. No. 1482 / 2014/ DVC, dt. 23.09.2014 issued by the 2nd respondent as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner as Field Assistant under MGNREG Scheme to Jammu Gram Panchayath, Gurla Mandal, Vizianagaram District with all consequential and incidental benefits attached to the post and to pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 44448 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings in Rc. No. 1482/2014/HR(A.C)/DVC, dt. 31.07.2014 and the proceddings in Rc. No. 1482/2014/DVC, dt. 23.09.2014 issued by the 2nd respondnet pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.P V V SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV (AP) The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.35535 OF 2014 ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive any further. Hence, the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Dated 09.03.2026 KGM 3 110 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.35535 OF 2014 Dated 09.03.2026 KGM