APHC010071852026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 4136/2026 Between: 1. BELLAMKONDA VENKATESWARLU @ VENKATESH, S/O. ESWARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O. KAKUTURU VILLAGE, VENKATACHALAM MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, NELLORE. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VENKATACHALAM POLICE STATION SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, VENKATACHALAM POLICE STATION, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. AMBAVARAPU SUDHAKAR REDDY, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. MANAGER IN TIRUMALA DAIRY, R/O. NEAR BODHANAM TOLL PLAZA, CHILLAKUR MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 2 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.4136 of 2026 Dated 23.02.2026 C SUBODH Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- “…to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the inaction of the respondent authorities in acting upon the notice dt.29.01.2026 and on complaint of the petitioner dt.02.02.2026 and providing police protection as illegal, arbitrary, violation of Article 21 and 300- A of constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to act upon the notice, dt.29.01.2026 and complaint dt.02.02.2026 of the petitioner and pass….” 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader. 3. Sri C. Subodh, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner has already got issued a notice on 29.01.2026 to respondent Nos.1 to 4 and also submitted a representation dated 02.02.2026 requesting them to give necessary police protection to the petitioner and his family members. However, the said representation has not been considered by respondent Nos.1 to 4 in accordance with law, and hence, it is urged to allow the Writ Petition. 3 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.4136 of 2026 Dated 23.02.2026 4. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that pursuant to the representation, the police have called respondent No.5 and admonished him not to cause any inconvenience to the petitioner and to honour the interim injunction passed by the learned Civil Court. There is no inaction on the part of the police authorities in acting upon the representation dated 02.02.2026 submitted by the petitioner, and hence, it is urged to dismiss the Writ Petition. 5. Indeed the petitioner was granted an order of interim injunction restraining respondent No.5 from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the plaint schedule property in I.A.No.69 of 2024 in O.S.No.87 of 2024 by the learned I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Nellore (FAC) III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Nellore. When an interim injunction is in force against the respondent No.5, respondent No.5 is not supposed to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner. The respondent No.5 against whom no notice was issued. 6. Considering the above submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, this Court feels that the Writ Petition can be disposed of directing the respondent Nos.3 and 4 to give necessary protection to the petitioner against the high handed activities of the respondent No.5 if the respondent No.5 commits any cognizable offence against the petitioner. It is made clear that if the respondent No.5 violates the order granted by the 4 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.4136 of 2026 Dated 23.02.2026 jurisdictional Civil Court, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the learned Civil Court and file an appropriate application under Order XXXIX Rule 3A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for brevity ‘the CPC’) seeking appropriate action against the respondent No.5 for disobeying the orders granted by the learned Civil Court. 7. With the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 23.02.2026 PBS 5 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.4136 of 2026 Dated 23.02.2026 161 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 4136 of 2026 Date: 23.02.2026 PBS