APHC010070032011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 28362/2011 Between: 1. DR.CHELAMKURI VENKATA KRISHNA RAO,VSP DIST, S/O SUBBA RAO, R/O SEETAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. CHAIRMAN AP ENDOWMENTS HYD 2 OTRS, KACHIGUDA, HYDERABAD. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. SRI VENKATESWARA SWAMY TEMPLE KONGODU VILLAGE, KARAPA MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate Writ, Order or direction for call for records in O.A.NO.2636 of 2010 by its order dated 29.04.2011 by the 1st Respondent and quash the same IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 35022 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the orders passed in O.A.NO.2636 of 2010 by its order dated 2 29.04.2011 passed by the 1st Respondent pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. E S R PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 28362/2011 ORDER: There was no representation for the petitioner on 04.02.2026 and the matter is posted to today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today there is no representation for the petitioner. 2. On perusal of the record it is observed that the petitioner herein is challenging the order dated 29.04.2011 passed by the Endowments Tribunal in O.A.No.2636 of 2010. The orders passed in O.A.No.2636 of 2010, should be challenged by way of Civil Miscellaneous Appeal not by way of Writ Petition. As such, the Writ Petition is not maintainable. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as not maintainable. However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the order passed by the Tribunal by way of Civil Miscellaneous Appeal before the appropriate authority. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 09.02.2026 TPS 4 150 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 28362/2011 09.02.2026 TPS