Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1680 (CHH)

MANOJ BHARTI v. CHHATTISGARH RAJYA GRAMIN BANK

WPC/1093/2026 · 2026-03-12

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:12053 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1093 of 2026 1 - Manoj Bharti S/o Markande Bharti Aged About 50 Years R/o Ward No.43, Darripara, Ambikapur, Distt - Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - Chhattisgarh Rajya Gramin Bank Through - Branch Manager, Branch Ambikapur, District - Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Tehsildar Ambikapur, District - Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause title, as taken from the CIS system) For Petitioner For Respondent No.1 For Respondent No.2/State : : : Ms. Hamida Siddiqui, Advocate Mr. P.R. Patankar, Advocate Mr. Vinay Pandey, Dy. Adv. General (Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 13/03/2026 1. Heard. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the entire outstanding amount has been deposited with respondent No.1/ Gramin Bank, and respondent No.1 has also issued a “No Objection Certificate” (NOC) in favour of the petitioner, therefore, the present writ RUKHSAR BANO Digitally signed by RUKHSAR BANO Date: 2026.03.16 10:21:36 +0530 2 petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent No.1/Gramin Bank also conceded the aforesaid facts. 4. In view of above submission made by learned counsel for both the parties, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 5. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) JUDGE Rukhsar