MOHD RAFI v. UNION OF INDIA TH ITS SECRETARY HOME, NEW DELHI AND OTHERS
WP(C)/69/2026 · 2026-01-20
Rajesh Sekhri
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 168 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 168 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 26
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP (C) No. 69/2026 CM No. 188/2026
Date of pronouncement: 20.01.2026 Uploaded on: 20.01.2026 Mohd Rafi
…. Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through:- Mr. Arshad Majid Malik, Advocate V/s
Union of India & Ors.
…..Respondent(s)
Through:- Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Assisting Counsel to Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
ORDER (ORAL)
20.01.2026
1. The petitioner is stated to have preferred a representation dated 19.06.2025 for the redressal of his grievance before the respondents and short grievance of the petitioner is that same is not being accorded
consideration, despite lapse of considerable time.
2. Mr. Arshad Majid Malik, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he will be satisfied if respondents are directed to decide the representation preferred by the petitioner within a timeframe. Statement of learned counsel for the petitioner is taken on record.
3. Having regard of the aforesaid, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the representation dated 19.06.2025, preferred by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date a copy of this order is made available.
4. Disposed of.
(RAJESH SEKHRI)
JUDGE JAMMU 20.01.2026 Asif Tantray