MAHENDRA SINGH S/O LAXMAN SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/2235/2026 · 2026-02-12
Ganesh Ram Meena
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16796 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16796 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:6600] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No. 2235/2026 Mahendra Singh S/o Laxman Singh, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Ramlal Khati Ki Gali, Bajrang Colony, Kishangarh Police Station Gandhi Nagar, District Ajmer. (At Present Confined At Central Jail, Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hari Krishana Sharma Mr. Babu Lal Yogi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, Addl.G.A.cum P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 12/02/2026
1. The accused-petitioner has filed this second bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.321/2025 registered with the Police Station Gandhi Nagar (Ajmer), District Ajmer for offence under Sections 331(7), 309(6) and 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023. 2. The learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that as per the contents of the F.I.R., two persons were involved in the incident, out of which, one is a male and the other one is a female. He also submits that during investigation, the persons who were said to be involved in the
[2026:RJ-JP:6600] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2235/2026] incident, have been identified as Mohmmad Ashiq and Smt. Pooja Kumari. He further submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 27.11.2025 and the police after completion of the investigation, has submitted charge-sheet in the matter. He also submits that the trial of the case is likely to take considerable time to conclude, therefore, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 3. The learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submits that the accused-petitioner is said to be standing out side of the premises when two other persons were committing the alleged offence inside the house. 4. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor. 5. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and so also the allegation against the accused-petitioner and the fact that the police after completion of the investigation, has submitted charge-sheet in the matter, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6.
Accordingly, this second bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on
[2026:RJ-JP:6600] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2235/2026] all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /2