Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16792 (KAR)

SRI. RAMAKRISHNASHASTRI. J v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/5255/2023 · 2026-02-23

M Nagaprasanna

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11781 CRL.P No. 5255 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5255 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. RAMAKRISHNASHASTRI. J SON OF JANAKIRAM SHASTRY, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, 2. SMT. UMA WIFE OF K. S. JANAKIRAMA SHASTRY, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, 3. K. S. JANAKIRAMA SHASTRY SON OF SAMPANGI RAMA SHASTRY, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT KURIYANAPALLI VILLAGE, VEPANAHALLI TALUK, KRISHNAGIRI, TAMILNADU-635 121. PRESENTLY RESIDING AT SRI RAMA NILAYA, P-15, 2ND CROSS, 4TH MAIN, NAGAPPA BLOCK, DEVAIAH PARK, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU-560 055. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NAGARAJAPPA A., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11781 CRL.P No. 5255 of 2023 AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY GUBBI POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. SMT. SHREYA. L. R. WIFE OF RAMAKEISHNASHASTRY. J, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS, RESIDING AT LAKKENAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, GUBBI- 572901. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.N.JAGADEESH, ADDL. SPP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE FIR DATED 06.05.2023 IN CR.NO.135/2023 BEFORE THE RESPONDENT NO.1 GUBBI POLICE, ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, GUBBI, TUMKUR DISTRICT, FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 506, 498A, 504, 323, 114 UNDER THE IPC, 1860 AND U/S 3 AND 4 OF D.P. ACT, 1961. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11781 CRL.P No. 5255 of 2023 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submit that during the pendency of the petition, the Police after investigation have filed the final report-charge sheet. 2. In the light of filing of the charge sheet, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the petition and raise a challenge to the charge sheet. 3. Liberty so sought is granted. 4. The petition is disposed as withdrawn. 5. In view of disposal of the petition, pending application does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, the same is disposed of. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE JS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 235