Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16786 (RAJ)

PRADEEP JANGID S/O RAMCHANDRA JANGID v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/2482/2024 · 2026-02-16

Anuroop Singhi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:7406] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2482/2024 1. Pradeep Jangid S/o Ramchandra Jangid, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Flat No. 301, Third Floor, Bachpan Hospital, Mohalla Shekupura, Sikar Raj. 2. Bhanwar Lal Jangid S/o Mal Chand Jangid, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Balaji Vihar, Palwas Marg, Sikar, Raj. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Government Secretariat, Jaipur Rajasthan. 2. Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. District Collector, Sikar, Rajasthan. 4. Shri Kalyan Arogya Sadan, Bajaj Gram, Sanwali, Sikar Through Secretary (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Nikita Singhal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vidyadhar Gathala, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 16/02/2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer:- "It is, therefore, humbly prayed that this writ petition may be allowed and the entire record of the case be called for and be perused by this Hon’ble Court, if so pleases: i. By issuing an appropriate writ or order or direction, the respondents be directed to Quash and set aside the allotment made in Johad land in Khasra no. 263 (old) (885, 886 (New) situated in village Bajaj gram sanwali, Patwar chandpura, Tehsil Sikar Gramin. [2026:RJ-JP:7406] (2 of 3) [CW-2482/2024] ii. By issuing an appropriate writ or order or direction, the respondents be directed to remove the illegal encroachment made in Khasra no. 263 (old) (885, 886 (New) situated in village Bajaj gram sanwali, Patwar chandpura, Tehsil Sikar Gramin and an unrestricted access be provided to cattle and animals as per government office letter dated 3.10.1962 and 25.2.1963. iii. Any other order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fir and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and in favour of the writ petitioners may also be passed.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in the present matter, the petitioners have submitted a representation before the District Collector, Sikar, Rajasthan, however, no heed was paid by the District Collector, Sikar, Rajasthan, to it. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners prays that the present writ petition be disposed of in light of the order dated 30.01.2019 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. [D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No.10819/2018] with liberty to the petitioners to file representation(s) before the Public Land Protection Cell (hereinafter referred to as ‘PLPC’) constituted in compliance of the order passed in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena (supra). 4. In that view of the matter, the present writ petition stands disposed of in light of the order passed in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena (supra) with a direction to the petitioners to file representation(s) before the PLPC. It is further directed that the PLPC shall decide the representation(s), if any, filed by the [2026:RJ-JP:7406] (3 of 3) [CW-2482/2024] petitioners, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners within a period of one month from the date of receipt of such representation. 5. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 6. Needless to say, this order has been passed only in the context of deciding the petitioners’ representation and in no manner be construed as directing the same to be decided in a particular manner. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J DANISH USMANI /99