Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16785 (AP)

M/s. Udayam Constructions v. Sri. G Sai Prasad, I.A.S.

CC/581/2026 · 2026-02-12

V Sujatha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010070002026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 581/2026 Between: 1. M/S. UDAYAM CONSTRUCTIONS, REP. BY ITS PROPRITOR, ATIURI UMA MAHESWARA RAO, S/O. ATIURI PRERR BABU, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 1-151, GUDIVASA ROAD NIDUMOLU (V), MOVVA (M), KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI G SAI PRASAD I A S, PRINCIPLE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, IRRIGATION AND CAD WATER RESOURCES RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. SMT C NAGARANI I A S, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR (IRRIGATION WING) BHIMAVARAM WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. SRI C DEVA PRAKASH, THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, IRRIGATION WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. SRI C SATYANARAYANA, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, DRAINAGE DIVISION, BHIMVARAM, WEST GODAVARI. ...CONTEMNOR(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ANNAMNEEDI BALAKRISHNA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 581/2026 O R D E R: This Contempt Case is filed for willful violation of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.23915 of 2025 on 09.10.2025, wherein this Court passed the following order: “5. In view of the facts and circumstances submitted in the affidavit. and the directions of this Court in various cases and after hearing the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to release the admitted amounts to the petitioner in accordance with the quality control certificates dated 05.06.2025 issued by the respondents within a period of four (04) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. As far as interest component is concerned, if there is any subsisting clause in the agreement/work order envisaging payment of interest upon any amount which is due and payable, the same is binding upon both the parties. There shall be no order as to costs”. 2. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri A.Balakrishna, learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the order dated 09.10.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.23915 of 2025 has been complied-with by the respondents. Therefore, requested this Court to close the contempt case. 3. Recording the above submission, the Contempt Case is closed. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. _______________________ SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA KS Dated 13.02.2026. 4 33 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 581/2026 DATED 13.02.2026 KS