$~148 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010398282026 + W.P.(C) 12369/2026 & CM APPL. 57329/2026 DR VIJAY AYURVEDIC MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE .....Petitioner Through: Mr Animesh Kumar Mr Nishant Kumar Dr Sumit Kumar Ms Aprajita Mr Yashwardhan Singh, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv. SPC for UOI Mr Vinay Kaushik Government Pleader Mr Kumar Prashant and Ms Simran Chhabra, Advs. for R2-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E R % 25.08.2026 1. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayers:- “a) Issue an appropriate writ/order/direction in nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 02.07.2026 issued by the Respondent No 3. AND b) Issue an appropriate writ/order/direction in nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 30.07.2026 issued by the Respondent No 2. AND c) Issue appropriate writ/order/direction in nature of Mandamus directing the Respondent No 3 to consider the application for permission to admit students with 100 Seats for AY 2026-27 in accordance with NCISM ACT, 2020 and the This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/09/2026 at 10:59:55 regulations made thereunder within stipulated time frame. ..” 2. For the reasons stated in the petition, issue notice. 3. Mr. Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of respondent No. 1 and Mr. Kumar Prashant, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 and 3. 4. Mr. Animesh Kumar, states that the petitioner would be satisfied if respondent No. 1 is directed to decide the second appeal of the petitioner expeditiously within 2 weeks from today. 5. I am of the view, the said request is reasonable as the counselling is to commence some time in September. 6. For the said reasons, the petition is disposed of granting 2 weeks to respondent No. 1 to decide the second appeal of the petitioner. 7. The appellate authority shall also consider the aspect of fresh inspection of the petitioner institute. 8. The Court has not examined the merits/demerits of the controversy raised in the present petition. Needless to add, the petitioner shall also be at liberty to avail of its rights in accordance with law against the Order if required. JASMEET SINGH, J AUGUST 25, 2026/AS This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/09/2026 at 10:59:55