Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16782 (RAJ)

KHUSBU PALIWAL W/O SURESH BAIRWA D/O CHANDRA PRAKASHH BAIRWA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/205/2026 · 2026-02-05

Bhuwan Goyal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:5460] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 205/2026 1. Khusbu Paliwal W/o Suresh Bairwa D/o Chandra Prakashh Bairwa, Age 19 Years 6 Month Dob (12-05-2006) R/o 37A, Mamta Vihar -C, Madrampura Sanganer Jaipur Rajasthan Rajasthan Adhar No 491288815838 2. Suresh Bairwa S/o Shri Mahaveer Prasad Bairwa, Aged About 23 Years, (Dob 14-12-3003) R/o 36A, Mamta Vihar-C Madrampura Sanganer Jaipur Raj Adhar No 664791223780 ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Director General Of Rajasthan Police, Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur Rajasthan 2. The Commissioner Of Police, Commissionerate Jaipur Government Hostle C- Scheme Jaipur Rajasthan 3. The Deputy Commissioner Of Police, South Jaipur Mahanagar Rajasthan 4. The Station House Officer (Sho), Muhana, Jaipur Mahanagar South Rajasthan 5. Chandra Prakash Bairwa S/o Syokaran Bairwa, Aged About 46 Years, R/o 37A Mamta Vihar C, Madrampura Sanganer Police Station Muhana Jaipur Rajasthan 6. Hansraj Bairwa S/o Syokaran Bairwa, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Madrampura Sanganer Police Station Muhana Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.B.Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, Dy.GA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 05/02/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled. [2026:RJ-JP:5460] (2 of 3) [CRLW-205/2026] 2. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos. 5 & 6 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners solemnized their marriage on 13.06.2025 at Arya Samaj Moti Katla Jaipur Rajasthan and same has been registered before the Marriage Registration Officer, Nagar Nigam Jaipur Heritage, Rajasthan. A copy of the petitioners’ marriage registration certificate has been annexed with the petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos. 5 & 6 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they have prayed for protection. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522. 5. Learned Deputy Government Advocate has opposed the same. 6. Both the petitioners are present in person today in the court. Their signature have been obtained on the court’s order sheet and they have been duly identified by their counsel. 7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners are directed to file an appropriate application seeking protection before the concerned SHO, who in turn, is directed that if such an application is filed before him, he will provide adequate protection to the petitioners as per law and ensure that no harm is caused to them. [2026:RJ-JP:5460] (3 of 3) [CRLW-205/2026] 8. The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 9. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 10. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect other civil/ criminal proceedings, if any pending in the present matter. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J Anu/226