(2026:JHHC:17380) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 5309 of 2026 1. Nesar Ansari, aged 29 years, 2. Afreed Ansari, aged about 19 years, (Both are sons of Julfan Ansari, resident of village – Pandri, PO- Pandri, PS – Chanho, District – Ranchi. … … …Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … …Opp. Party ------ For the Petitioners : Md. Razaullah Ansari, Advocate For the State : Ms. Anuradha Sahay, Addl. P.P. ------ HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ Order No:- 02, Dated:- 16th June, 2026 Heard the parties. The petitioners have moved before this Court for grant of bail in connection with Chanho P.S. Case No. 32 of 2026registered for the offences punishable under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 352, 351(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the allegation against the petitioners, are that the petitioners, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, attempted to murder Sehbaz Ansari by assaulting him. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners, are false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-15 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners have no criminal antecedents. It is next submitted that the main allegation is against the co-accused Sohail Ansari, who hit the head of the victim with a pair of scissors which struck inside the head of the victim. It is also submitted that there is no direct and specific allegation against the petitioners. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will cooperate with the trial of the case and that they will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is next submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 20.03.2026 as has been mentioned in para-14 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the co- accused person with similar allegation has already been granted bail by this Court in B.A. No. 4166 of 2026. Hence it is submitted that the petitioners be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi, in connection with Chanho P.S. Case No.32 of 2026, with the condition that they will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated – 16.06.2026 Aditi