Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1678 (RAJ)

VIJAYRAM BHEEL S/O DEVILAL BHEEL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/2939/2026 · 2026-03-23

Sameer Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:12171] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2939/2026 Vijayram Bheel S/o Devilal Bheel, R/o Mundesara, Police Station Bhaisroadgarh, District Chittorgarh (Raj) (Confined At District Jail Bundi). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Asgar Khan with Mr. Mohd. Arfan Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 23/03/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 31/2026 registered at Police Station Sadar, Bundi, District Bundi for the offence(s) under Sections 8/20 of the NDPS Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the applicant is a young person, aged about 24 years. It is further submitted that accused-applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is also submitted that the quantity of recovered contraband, i.e., ganja is approximately 6.610 kilograms which is much less than the prescribed commercial quantity, i.e., 20 kilograms. It is next submitted that charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter. It is further submitted that [2026:RJ-JP:12171] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2939/2026] accused-applicant has no criminal antecedents registered against him. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the present bail application. 4. Having heard the contentions made by the learned counsel for the parties, upon a perusal of the material available on record and taking note of the fact that the applicant is a young person, aged about 24 years; that the quantity of recovered contraband, i.e., ganja is 6.610 kilograms which is much less than the prescribed commercial quantity, i.e., 20 kilograms; that charge- sheet has already been filed in the matter; that the accused- applicant has no criminal antecedents registered against him, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances but without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Vijayram Bheel Son of Devilal Bheel shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned Trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J RAHUL KUMAR /99