WP No. 8893 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 8893 of 2026 K. Radha ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Chenglapattu District, Chenglapattu 2. The Tahsildar Otteri, Peerakankaranai, Vandalaur, Chennai 600 048 ..Respondent(s) Direct the respondent No. 2 to consider the representation dated 17.11.2025 and pass orders for issuance fo patta in respect of the property bearing survey no. 110/1B grama natham, cherry Natham at no 8 Ayyanchery village kattankulathur Panchayat union chengalpattu District. For Petitioner(s): Mr.T.I.Ramanathan For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Jayaprakash Govt Advocate Order This writ petition has been filed to direct the second respondent to issue grama natham patta in favour of the petitioner for the property, morefully described in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition, based on the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 8893 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 petitioner's representation dated 17.11.2025, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2.The petitioner seeks for issuance of patta in her name for the property, morefully described in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition. She has given a representation on 17.11.2025 to the second respondent seeking for issuance of patta in her name. Since the said representation has not been considered, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. 3.Mr.C.Jayaparaksh, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 4.No prejudice would be caused to the second respondent if the petitioner’s representation, as stated supra, is considered, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner and after hearing the objections from the neighbouring land owners, if any or any other third party whom the second respondent deems it fit to enquire, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 5.This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 8893 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 6.Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the second respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representation dated 17.11.2025 seeking for issuance of grama natham patta in her name for the property, morefully described in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition, after hearing the objections from the neighbouring land owners, if any or any other third party whom the second respondent deems it fit to enquire, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 12-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VGA To 1. The District Collector Chenglapattu District, Chenglapattu 2. The Tahsildar Otteri, Peerakankaranai, Vandalaur, Chennai 600 048 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 8893 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. VGA WP No. 8893 of 2026 12-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis