Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16779 (BOM)

ADITYA BIRLA CAPITAL LIMITED v. SUPREET KUMAR

ARBP/451/2026 · 2026-10-09

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

48-arbp-451-2026.doc Vivekanand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 451 OF 2026 Aditya Birla Capital Limited … Petitioner V/s. Supreet Kumar … Respondent Mr. Gaurav Jain a/w Adv. Malavika Sreejith i/b Indialaw LLP, for the Petitioner. Mr. Moksh Jain i/b Wadhwa & Co., for the Respondent. CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : OCTOBER 9, 2026 P.C.: 1. Since the Respondent has failed to file disclosure as directed by this Court, the Petitioner has made out a case for the grant of relief in terms of prayer Clause (b). 2. As regards other reliefs, it shall be open to the Petitioner to apply before the Arbitral Tribunal. 3. The petition is disposed of. (AMIT BORKAR, J.) 1 VIVEKANAND RAJENDRA BONDE Digitally signed by VIVEKANAND RAJENDRA BONDE Date: 2026.10.09 16:49:25 +0530