Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010231322026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/1069/2026 SANKAR MANDAL AND 4 ORS SON OF MOHAN MANDAL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO. 1 BISHNUPUR POST OFFICE- BHOTAGAON POLICE STATION- PANBARI DISTRICT- CHIRANG ASSAM PIN- 783390 2: BASHUDEV MANDAL SON OF MOHAN MANDAL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO. 1 BISHNUPUR POST OFFICE- BHOTAGAON POLICE STATION- PANBARI DISTRICT- CHIRANG ASSAM PIN- 783390 3: SUDEV MANDAL SON OF RAICHARAN MANDAL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO. 1 BISHNUPUR POST OFFICE- BHOTAGAON POLICE STATION- PANBARI DISTRICT- CHIRANG ASSAM PIN- 783390 4: MONORANJAN MANDAL @ MONO MANDAL SON OF SURESH CHANDRA MANDAL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO. 1 BISHNUPUR Page No.# 2/3 POST OFFICE- BHOTAGAON POLICE STATION- PANBARI DISTRICT- CHIRANG ASSAM PIN- 783390 5: SURENDRA MANDAL @ MUSHIRAM MANDAL SON OF NITAL MANDAL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO. 1 BISHNUPUR POST OFFICE- BHOTAGAON POLICE STATION- PANBARI DISTRICT- CHIRANG ASSAM PIN- 783390 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTORS ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR. M AHMED Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN ORDER Date : 13.10.2026 Heard Mr. M. Ahmed, learned counsel for the applicants. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent. This application, under Section 430 of the BNSS, 2023, is preferred by the applicants for suspending the operation of the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 16.09.2026, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bijni, Chirang, in Sessions Case No. 24 of 2019 (arising out of Panbari P.S. Case No. 114/2018); and also to allow them to remain on previous bail. It is to be noted here that vide impugned judgment and order of conviction Page No.# 3/3 and sentence dated 16.09.2026, the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bijni, Chirang (‘trial Court’, for short) has convicted the applicants under Sections 143, 342/149, 325/149, 326/149 of the IPC, and sentenced them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 6 (six) months under Section 143 the IPC; rigorous imprisonment for 1 (one) year for the offences under Sections 342/149 of the IPC; rigorous imprisonment for 2 (two) years and fine of Rs. 10,000/- with default stipulation for the offences under Sections 325/149 of the IPC; and rigorous imprisonment for 2 (two) years and fine of Rs. 10,000/- with default stipulation for the offences under Sections 326/149 of the IPC. Mr. Ahmed, learned counsel for the applicants submits that after the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 16.09.2026, was passed, the learned trial Court had allowed the applicants to remain on previous and in view of the sentence so handed down by the learned trial Court, and also in view of the order of allowing them to remain on previous bail, he submits that the applicants may be allowed to remain on previous bail till disposal of the connected appeal. Accordingly, taking note of the submission of Mr. Ahmed, learned counsel for the applicants and also considering the facts and circumstances on the record, especially the period of conviction, and further in view of admission of the connected appeal, this Court is inclined to allow this application. Accordingly, the applicants are allowed to remain on previous bail till disposal of the connected appeal. In terms of above, this I.A. stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant