Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16777 (GAU)

ZIARUL HOQUE v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./3071/2026 · 2026-10-13

Rajesh Mazumdar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010218692026 2026:GAU-AS:15658 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3071/2026 ZIARUL HOQUE S/O- IMAN ALI, VILL.- BHALUKI SALMARA, P.O.-BALABHITHA, P.S.- BARPETA ROAD,D IST.-BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN-781313 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE P.P., ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S AHMED, MR M RAHMAN,MR. A S AHMED,T UDDIN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER Date : 14.10. 2026 Heard Mr. S. Ahmed, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D.P. Goswami, learned Addl. P.P. for the State. 2. The present petition is filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 for grant of Page No.# 2/2 regular bail to the petitioner, namely, Ziarul Hoque, in connection with Jagiroad P.S. Case No. 163/2026 under Section 338/ 61 (2)/ 318 (4)/ 308 of BNS R/W 66 © of I.T. Act, 2000. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has completed 90 days in custody during the investigation period and the charge- sheet has not yet been submitted and, therefore, the petitioner would be entitled to default bail. 4. The learned Addl. P.P. has fairly admitted that he is under instructions that the charge-sheet has not been submitted. In view of the above, the petitioner would be entitled to default bail. 5. Accordingly, the learned CJM, Morigaon, shall release the petitioner on default bail on such terms and conditions as the learned CJM may deem fit and proper. 6. The bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant