Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16774 (KAR)

SIDDAGANGA ENTERPRISES v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/13501/2026 · 2026-04-27

Sachin Shankar Magadum

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23302 WP No. 13501 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 13501 OF 2026 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SIDDAGANGA ENTERPRISES CLASS-1 GOVT. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS AND CONSULTING ENGINEERS, NO.55, 10TH MAIN, MC LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGARA, BENGALURU - 560 040. REP BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI. SHIVARUDRAIAH EMAIL: SHIVARUDRAIAHKG967@GMAIL.COM MOBILE: 9880032661. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SOMASHEKHARAIAH.R.P, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY THE SECRETARY, DEPT. OF PERSONAL ADMINISTRATION REFORMS, (EXECUTION), VIDHANA SOUDHA DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKAR, AGA) Digitally signed by NAGARAJA B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23302 WP No. 13501 of 2026 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO RELEASE THE AMOUNT OF RS.20,40,638/- TOGETHER WITH APPLICABLE INTEREST WITH DAMAGES OF RS. 10,00,000/- BY CONSIDERING THE CORRESPONDENCE MADE BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND RESPONDENT DATED 16.02.2023, 08.06.2023, 14.06.2023, 30.09.2023, 20.12.2023, 09.09.2024, 30.08.2024, 27.08.2024, 23.12.2024, 31.12.2024 ARE HEREWITH PRODUCED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE-C, C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, C6, C7, C8, C9 AND C10 RESPECTIVELY AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM ORAL ORDER The petitioner, in the captioned writ petition, is seeking direction against the respondent to release an amount of ₹20,40,638/- and also with interest and damage of ₹10,00,000/- by considering correspondence made by the petitioner as per Annexures-C and C1 to C.10 respectively. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23302 WP No. 13501 of 2026 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA. 3. Facts leading to the case are as under; The petitioner, being a successful bidder pursuant to the tender notification issued by the State Government for undertaking Decorative Illumination/Lighting with DG Set at Vidhana Soudha and Vikasa Soudha, asserts that he has duly executed the work entrusted to him in terms of the contractual stipulations. It is the specific case of the petitioner that upon completion of the work, he has submitted the requisite bills and invoices to the competent authority for processing and disbursement. However, despite repeated representations and correspondences placed on record, the respondents have not taken any steps to process the said bills. The inaction on the part of the respondents in settling the legitimate dues has compelled the petitioner to invoke the extraordinary - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23302 WP No. 13501 of 2026 jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 4. Per-contra, learned Additional Government Advocate, on instructions, submits that the bills and invoices furnished by the petitioner are under active consideration by the competent authority. She would submit that certain administrative formalities are required to be complied with and, if reasonable time is granted, the respondents would process the petitioner’s claim and take an appropriate decision in accordance with law. 5. Recording the submission made by the learned Additional Government Advocate and having regard to the limited grievance ventilated by the petitioner, this Court is of the considered view that the ends of justice would be met by issuing a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner’s representations within a time-bound framework. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23302 WP No. 13501 of 2026 ORDER (i) The writ petition is disposed of. (ii) The respondents are directed to consider the representations/correspondences dated 16.02.2023, 08.06.2023, 14.06.2023, 30.09.2023, 20.12.2023, 09.09.2024, 30.08.2024, 27.08.2024, 23.12.2024 and 31.12.2024, produced at Annexures–C and C.1 to C.10 and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law. (iii) Such consideration and decision shall be completed within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. (iv) It is needless to observe that the decision so taken shall be duly communicated to the petitioner forthwith. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE NBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31