Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
10.STR-26-2018.DOC Gauri Gaekwad IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SALES TAX REFERENCE NO. 26 OF 2018 IN REFERENCE APPLICATION NO. 309 OF 2007 WITH SALES TAX REFERENCE (L) NO. 70 OF 2011 IN REFERENCE APPLICATION NO. 310 OF 2007 Mukand Limited …Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra …Respondent Mr. Jas Sanghavi a/w. Ms. Linzy Sharan i/b. PDS Legal for the Applicant. Ms. Jyoti Chavan, Addl. GP a/w. Mr. Himanshu Takke, AGP for the Respondent.
CORAM:
SUMAN SHYAM & GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, JJ. DATED:
9th OCTOBER 2026. PC:-
1. Mr. Sanghavi, learned counsel for the Applicant, submits that the question of law framed in these Sales Tax References has already been answered by the Division Bench of this Court in the matter of Borosil Glass Works Ltd. v/s. Commissioner of Sales Tax and Ors.1, whereby the decision of the Court has gone against the Assessee. Therefore, the question of law does not survive for
consideration by this Court in the present Sales Tax References.
1. 2025 SCC OnLine Bom 4319 GAURI AMIT GAEKWAD Digitally signed by GAURI AMIT GAEKWAD Date: 2026.10.09 15:08:17 +0530
10.STR-26-2018.DOC Ms. Jyoti Chavan, learned Addl. GP, on verification of the records, has agreed to such statement.
2. In view of the above, these Sales Tax References stand
disposed of in the light of the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in the matter of Borosil Glass Works Ltd. (supra).
(GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.) (SUMAN SHYAM, J.)